Sunday, November 13, 2011

Aloha to Ashley March - Why Self Publishing is Good for Readers

Steve spends an afternoon reading ....

News alert! Today security is heavy on Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam:

- In the morning, the H50 cast visits my son's elementary school to promote healthy living to military families.

- In the afternoon, Mrs. Obama is speaking to military spouses during a job fair.

I'll provide a full report on Tuesday!

 
It is my distinct pleasure to welcome back Ashley March.  She hit the ground running with two traditionally published books, SEDUCING THE DUCHESS and ROMANCING THE COUNTESS, with an ebook in between, ROMANCING LADY CECILY.  Now Ashley is venturing into self publishing. I asked Ashley if she would blog about the impact of self publishing to readers. Take it away, Ashely!




Why Self-Publishing is Good for Readers 

I’m thrilled to be back here at SOS Aloha once again! Although I visited the blog in September to celebrate the release of my latest book, ROMANCING THE COUNTESS, Kim invited me to return today to talk about self-publishing.

In the past year or so, the digital revolution has not only revolutionized the way that readers buy their books and read them; it has also revolutionized the publishing industry and the way that authors are now able to publish their books. As both a reader and a writer, I’m fortunate to have the perspective of both worlds. I’m sure that some readers here know a lot about self-publishing, but for those who don’t, I thought I’d explain from this dual perspective why I believe self-publishing is good for readers (not listed in any particular order).

Note: For my purposes, traditional publishing does not refer to New York publishers most of the time, but to any publisher who is not the author.

1) Writers who self-publish can write that they want to write.

Generally, this means that, as a reader, you will be able to find more varied stories. For historical romance specifically, this means that self-published authors may feel free to write outside the Regency period to explore a wealth of other historical settings. I know we all love the Regency period (I don’t know of any historical fan that doesn’t) but I also know that many of us long for variety. For those of you who love westerns, this means that authors who have always loved westerns, too, are now only driven by their creativity, not by what their publisher believes they can sell. The same with colonial America, a setting I often hear that readers want more of. This is only the historical genre I’m talking about, too. I’ve heard that romantic suspense self-published authors are finding a great audience as well. The bottom line? With the freedom of being able to write what they want to write, authors have a greater chance of now connecting with readers who want to read those specific stores, too.

2) Writers who self-publish can publish when they want to publish.

I don’t know about you, but when I find a writer I adore, it seems that they can’t write fast enough; I devour every book of theirs I can get my hands on. With the traditional publishing world, once an author turns a manuscript in, it usually takes 12-18 months (if not longer) for that book to be published—although it’s true that digital publishers such as Samhain and Carina take much less time. Granted, not all self-published writers will be able to publish more than 1 or 2 books a year even out on their own, but with authors no longer having to wait for the usual cycle inside a publishing house, they can get their manuscript edited, cover art created, and entire book published within a matter of months from the time of completion. This means they can publish more books a year, which means that we, devoted readers that we are, can read more from our favorite authors each year than we could have with traditionally published books. 

3) We can read backlist titles from authors who have their rights reverted. 

For those authors who have previous books that have gone out of print and who now own their rights, they are able to self-publish these old books to find new audiences. For readers, this means that we can often read books that we were never able to find in the store and which might have been expensive to find as used copies. Depending on the price (and most backlist titles are priced at lower rates, I’ve found), it means that we can glom these old books of our favorite authors (as I’ve recently done with Laura Lee Guhrke), and it means that we can discover new-to-us authors as well (which recently happened to me with Candice Hern).

4) Self-published authors make more money.

Assuming that their self-published books sell, of course, self-published authors make more money off of their self-published books than they would have if the books were traditionally published. The standard right now in traditional publishing—at least in the romance genre—is for authors to receive 8% royalties for mass market paperbacks and 25% for digital royalties (and those are percentages off of the publisher’s net profit, not gross). Just to compare with Amazon—currently the largest of the digital e-retailers—the lowest percentage authors can receive (depending on how they price their books) is 35%. The highest is 70%.

Let me give you an example. Suppose someone buys a traditionally published book in digital format at $7.99. Although 25% of that would be $1.99, usually the author receives even less than that amount because, again, the author is not receiving 25% of the gross profit, but 25% of the publisher’s net profit. This can vary, of course, but let’s just say that author is really earning $1.00 from that $7.99 traditionally published e-book. And it costs the reader $7.99 to buy.

Now suppose someone buys a self-published book in digital format at $4.99 (a price which allows for Amazon’s 70% royalty rate). While Amazon does take some fees out of these royalties (this is why Whispernet is free for the consumer; it’s taken out of royalties), the majority of that 70% goes to the author. So instead of $1.00 (if that much) from a traditionally published e-book, a self-published author could make $3.00+. Who wins in this situation? Both the reader and the author; the reader is paying less for a digital book, and the author is receiving more for their hard-earned work. Even if you look at an ebook priced at $2.99, the author still receives more for that book than they would have with a publishing company. In addition, some authors now have stores on their websites where readers can purchase and download files for your specific e-reader directly, giving the author 100% of profits (minus any Paypal/other merchant fees for the transaction, which are minimal).

Of course, everyone is happy if the reader saves money and the author makes money. But what’s most important about this? Most importantly, authors who are able to make more money from self-publishing can support themselves better from their writing, which in turns mean that they’re more likely to be able to pursue writing as a full-time career (or, in some cases, to continue writing at all). With traditional publishing, unless you’re one of the very, very lucky few, you might not ever be able to quit your day job. And although not everyone will be able to quit their day job with self-publishing, of course, the greater amount of money earned per book makes this possibility much more likely. And the more books an author is able to write means that we have more books to read. It’s a reader’s paradise. =)

5) Many self-published authors do not include DRM restrictions.

If you’re not familiar with this term “DRM”, that’s okay. I’m not even going to bother explaining what it stands for. The most important thing to note about this is that DRM sets limits on who around the world is able to access an e-book. Most traditional publishers practice DRM restriction. The idea is that DRM restrictions keep people from certain geographic locations unable to access the book because those rights haven’t been granted; it also tries to protect against piracy. What really happens, though, is that people who do pirate are usually technologically savvy enough to know how to break these DRM restrictions and pirate the book anyway. In truth, the only people DRM hurts are the frustrated readers who want to read the book but can’t because of the DRM settings, and who (and I’m not excusing this here, just stating what happens) might buy the pirated book or download it for free at a pirate site (which still gets paid from sponsors) because all they want to do is read it.
Self-published authors generally do not set DRM restrictions, but make their books available worldwide. This means that international readers can access the book through the usual means and buy the legal copy. In general, I believe that 99% of readers do value an author’s work and do believe that it’s only fair to pay them for that work—and so those who might have downloaded pirated books in the past will hopefully support authors with buying legal copies, and not setting DRM restrictions makes this easier for everyone. 

6) Print is still possible with self-published books. 

The majority of readers I talk to seem to think that self-published=digital. While this is true for a percentage of books, most savvy authors value readers who still love reading print as equally as they value digital readers. The difference is that most self-published books are print-on-demand (POD). With POD you can order it online and have it shipped to you, or you can also usually order it through your local bookstore. The truth is that less and less—even traditionally published—books are being stocked on bookstore shelves now, so that only new releases of the better known authors are being put on display for print readers. Many readers (myself included) have experienced making a trip to the bookstore, only to find that the books I expected to be there—and honestly should have been there, since they were new releases—were not. 

The other factor to keep in consideration with POD books is that most POD publishers only offer trade paperbacks, not the mass market size. This might mean that it costs more to buy the POD book, which is certainly an important factor, but print books can be available with self-published books—it just depends on the individual author and what they have decided to do. 

To the self-published authors and most readers who buy self-published books, self-publishing is a win-win situation. Am I saying that traditionally published books are evil and that readers should stop buying these altogether? Certainly not. Some authors don’t want to take care of everything that comes along with self-publishing; they’d rather leave that up to a publisher. I’m certainly not saying that traditionally published books are of a lesser caliber than self-published books, or that any reader should have a moral obligation to buy one book over another depending on how they’re published. A reader’s right to buy and read what they choose is sacred in my opinion (and I’m speaking as a reader myself, too). If anything, I believe self-publishing is good for the industry as a whole because, just like it does for authors, self-publishing gives readers choices. 

Am I saying that all self-published books are equal in terms of quality, either in editing/formatting or plot structure? Of course not. It’s true that there are some authors out there who are so anxious to make money that they’ll make a book available before it’s ready. But just like we readers do now, I think we know how to sort the dross from the gold. We read excerpts or samples; we check other readers’ ratings; we read reviews from trusted book bloggers and other review sources. And just like we currently check out a book from the library to see if we like the author’s work, with self-published books we might find a free or low-priced book that we can take a chance on to see if we’ll like other books from that author. 

Why am I telling you all this? Because the book industry is changing, and as a reader who invests both your time and money, you deserve to be informed. As someone who has the perspective of both sides, and as an author who has been traditionally published for three books but will soon be going the self-publishing route entirely (you can see my blog here for why I made this decision), I hope that I’ve helped you understand a little more about self-publishing and why it’s good for you, too. 

How much do you know about the changes going on in the publishing industry? Did you learn anything from this post that you found interesting? Do you have anything to add? Do you believe that self-publishing is a good thing for readers or not?

I’ll be giving away an Amazon digital copy of two self-published novellas to one random commenter - A DUKE FOR ALL SEASONS by Mia Marlowe and LOVE’S PORTRAIT by Monica Burns. Open internationally.


Mahalo, Ashley, for taking time from your busy schedule to share this insight with us!  To enter Ashley's giveaway, leave a comment by Saturday, November 19, 10 pm in Hawaii.  I'll randomly selected a winner and post on Sunday, November 20.

Mahalo,

Kim in Hawaii

To learn more about Ashley, her books, and her blog, check out her website at www.ashleymarch.com 
 
Air Force One arrives at Hickam Field


38 comments:

  1. Hi, Ashley! Congrats on your decision to go self-pub! As long as the book is well-written and capably edited, I don't care who the publisher is although the lack of DRM is a big plus.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Congrats on your new decision to go self-publishing. I just hope authors who go that route make their books available in all eformats and not just for the Kindle.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What an informative post. I learned a lot. Thanks so much for sharing and good luck with self publishing. I buy self pub all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That was an interesting post. I've noticed more authors venturing into self-publishing, recently.
    marlenebreakfield(at)yahoo(dot)com

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am at this point, and have been debating what to do. I've been leaning toward going with a publisher because I feel like I don't know enough about the industry to go it alone, but this has me rethinking. Thanks for the information.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The downside of self-publishing is the self-editing...there are many authors who would benefit from a little more editing but I do agree that as a reader, I am ecstatic to have access to many more books than ever before. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

    Sounds like you and the family will have a very exciting day Kim, keep us posted on how it goes!

    ReplyDelete
  7. First off, Kim that's super exciting about Mrs. Obama will be speaking to military spouses. Can't wait to hear your report.

    Oh Ashley, that's so exciting that you'll be venturing into self publishing. I learn more each time I read about the self pub industry. I'm actually excited that authors are starting to self publish some of their back lists. Who wants to spend $100 on a rare hardback copy when it's available for e-readers at less than $10? Unless it's that Christina Dodd one with the three armed lady.

    I kind of agree with Elf2060 about the self-editing thing but I also think that self pubbed authors can find someone to help edit. I'm sure that's not a problem for most authors. There's got to be someone they know who's a great editor.

    The only thing I don't like about self pubbed books (cause I'm a cover ho) is the fact that most of them feature the same guy or girl. Not that I'm complaining if the guy is good looking but if you're going to have an abtastic guy, he better be cut and not semi-cut on the front of the book.

    And instant gratification. *pets Kindle lovingly* /rant :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree that it is a great opportunity for authors to be able to self publish in this way and if they are making more money that's even better.

    I remember how excited I was when I won a small writing contest years ago and my story was published along with a bunch of others in a self published book on lulu.com. But it was a print copy of the book.

    I do think that more editing and proof reading needs to be done on these ebooks, too many times have I read about there being more mistakes in ebooks than in traditional print books.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Great post - thank you so much for sharing your insights, Ashley. As a reader, I'm thankful for the authors that go self-published - I'm all about have those choices.

    Can't wait to hear about all the activities, Kim!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have actually been reading plenty of indie reads and I think when I have an ereader that number is going to be more. Right now I buy indie books if the price is great but don't read them all. Some I do but many I'm keeping until I have an ereader. There are some great reads out there. It doesn't matter to me if a book is self-published or published traditionally as long as the story is good. I do think indie books have a way to go in marketing. They just have to get themselves out there :) I have a Duke for all Seasons but Love's Portraits sounds great.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wow... Ashley, I never knew all these details about self-publishing before. When you put it this way, it definitely is better this way. I think I read that Lortetta Chase and Stefanie Slone are doing self-publishing too so you are in terriWowfic company. :) Best of luck to you. :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. I wish you so much luck with your self publishing adventure. I want your books to continue coming and if they come sooner that would be perfect. Is this going to be eBook only?

    ReplyDelete
  13. I agree, the book industry is really changing. Thanks for such an informative post! I wish you all the best with your self publishing!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi Everyone! Thanks so much for visiting with me today! I've been out all day with the girls, but I'm happy to finally be here. =) (Individual comments coming soon.)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi Sheree! Thank you so much for your support. =) I agree--when it gets down to the heart of the matter, all that matters is whether the book (included editing and formatting) is good. I do have to say that I also still prefer a pretty cover even for ebooks, but even that's not a deal-breaker for me if I'm confident of the content.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi Danielle! Thank you. =) I believe most savvy authors think it's important to publish in all e-formats so that readers who use different devices will be able to read the book without worry. There might be a few who only look at publishing their books on Amazon, but I really do think this is a small percentage. (Thankfully.)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi Debby! Thank you so much for your comment! As a relatively new author even in the traditional publishing world, I'm always grateful to readers who give me a chance. I feel the same about those who give self-publishing a chance. Thank you for supporting books no matter how they're published. =)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hi mbreakfield! Glad you enjoyed the post. =) While it's true that a lot of authors are moving into self-publishing, I think that a lot are going to stay with traditional publishing, too. I think it will all depend on how much involved in the business side of writing an author wants to become. Both can be good choices, depending on the individual. I'm just grateful for the opportunity to continue writing as I wish for my own career vision.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hi Judy! It's definitely a big decision to make, and I truly believe you should be well-informed before making any decision. With that being said, even if you self-publish, you won't necessarily be "alone"; there are many author Yahoo loops devoted to self-publishing. I'm a member of IndieRomanceInk (open to the public on Yahoo), and highly recommend it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi Elf2060! I absolutely agree with you. There are a few self-published authors I know who have either put up their work without having anyone on the outside (meaning, not themselves or their family/friends) go over it, and some who may have hired a journalistic editor rather than a book editor (two vastly different things). But I wouldn't even say that an editor is enough, to be honest. In my mind, self-publishing authors should have editing, critiquing (this is still editing, but done by other writers), and beta reading (readers who read through the book before publication to give feedback). I'm not saying authors have to do this, and I think there are several talented people who need very limited input from others--but I do believe that *everyone* needs *some* input from outside sources.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hi Kati! *waves wildly* =) There are dozens of editors out there, ranging from very reasonable in price to outrageously expensive. But I agree that it's the responsibility of any self-pubbed author to make sure that their book is top-notch in editing and formatting. If there are any problems with the book, it shouldn't be because of these.

    And I agree with you on the covers. Even though some people say that covers don't matter with e-books because we don't constantly see the cover as we're reading, I still enjoy having a pretty cover when I'm buying an ebook and it's on my digital shelf.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hi Mary! I believe I've heard about people still self-publishing with lulu...I think it's one of the alternatives to Amazon's CreateSpace. Congratulations on your publication! =) And I definitely agree with you on editing--there's honestly no excuse for authors to put up something that's not 100% perfect in editing and formatting. With that being said, I have heard of several people saying that formatting can be very finicky--it might appear perfect when you upload it, but then going through the system changes it on the consumer's end. But again, this is why it's still important to not only get it right before you publish it, but also to proofread afterward to make sure readers are getting the best work possible. Of course, that's just my two cents. ;)

    I will say, however, that this needs to be done with traditionally published books, too. I've read several (both print and ebooks) where the editing was utterly lacking and, with the ebooks, the formatting was off. I guess this means that everyone needs a good editor and proofreader, no matter how the book is published.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Thanks so much, Karen! Choices are always a good thing. =)

    ReplyDelete
  24. Hi Na! =) I'm surprised to hear that you read ebooks now without an e-reader. I'm assuming you read them on your phone, though? I know that many people have said (myself included) that they can't stand to read books on the computer. Either way, I hope you get your e-reader soon so you can catch up on your TBR pile. ;)

    Thank you for your input on this. I absolutely agree that indie authors (especially those who are starting out in publishing directly as indie authors, not those who have transitioned from traditional publishing) have a lot to learn with promotion and marketing. With that being said, there are several indie author loops out there where people exchange ideas and resources, so hopefully this is looking up. Also, whereas bloggers and reviewers were very hesitant to review or promote indie authors in the past, it seems that they're also becoming more open to this. I'm sure the publishing industry is going to continue to change at a rapid pace, and while I honestly lament what this has meant for bookstores, I'm so happy that both readers and authors are getting more choices from these changes as a result.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hi May! =) Honestly, I think that's just the tip of the iceberg. And with the continued changes we're going to see in the next few years, it'll be interesting to see what is relevant then in the information I've posted today. And yay--I adore Loretta Chase and Stefanie Sloane! I have to tell you that sometimes it still makes me grin to realize I'm actually a published author, period. =D

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hi Audrey in MO! Thank you so much for your support! =) It means so much to me! Except for novellas or short stories, I intend to make all of my ebooks available in print as well, although with the distribution available, this will probably mean trade instead of mass market (I would prefer mass market, but it doesn't seem to be an option). And even on the short stories and novellas, if I can write enough of them to make the same length as a full-length novel, then I'll package them together and make them available in print as well. I appreciate all my readers and hope to give them the option to read books the way that they prefer. =)

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hi Linda! Thank you very much! =) It'll be interesting to see where it is in a few years. =)

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm all for self-publishing. Why shouldn't the author make more and it's that many more choices for us readers. I'm glad they still do print publishing too.

    catslady

    ReplyDelete
  29. I don't mind how a book is published, so long as the quality of the work does not diminish. I hope that folks like me who prefer a hard copy are not forgotten along the way.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hi catslady! I certainly hope that print never goes away. =) Even though I read ebooks mostly now for the sake of convenience, I still love collecting print books (especially if they're those pretty, hard cover editions), and I'd never want to take the chance that I can't access books through electronic means for whatever reason and I'd have nothing to read. =)

    ReplyDelete
  31. Hi marybelle! Thanks for visiting with me today. =) I agree--I don't think any shortcuts can be taken in publishing, simply because they're self-published or ebooks. And I hope that print never goes away. I personally plan to make my books available in both digital and print formats. I hope other authors do the same!

    ReplyDelete
  32. I enjoyed your post. You pointed out a few things I hadn’t really thought about before. I especially appreciated your first point, on variety and freedom of creativity for the writer. It is an exciting time for a writer, and for those who love to read.

    While I appreciate Elf2060’s point about editing, I think more and more self-published writers, especially those serious about their craft, understand the importance of an editor and professional looking cover.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I just love Ashley and her stories. I'm trying to follow all your blogs - you've been a very busy girl the past two months!
    I am a little scared with the self publishing bit - I love having my books in bed with me and never got into the e-readers - although I do own one.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Hi Anna! I think the freedom for a writer to control their own career is perhaps one of the most appealing things in self-publishing. So often a writer is told that they need to write a different story or a different character based on what the publisher projects will sell books. I think that having self-publishing available as a viable option for writers will mean that we'll have stories told that would never have been put on the page before, and that kind of freedom of creativity is exciting, in my opinion.

    I also agree with you about editing and cover art in the sense that the people I interact with are savvy about these things, but I do wonder about the individuals who don't have a community of other authors. One of the greatest things I see with self-publishing is the community that is growing up for indie authors. I think as these become larger and more widespread, it's likely that we'll see fewer issues with bad editing and cover art. Or, at least, that's my hope.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Hi Molly! =) Thank you! *blushes* And it's been so great to see you around the blogs! Two things on print: 1) I do sincerely doubt that print will ever go away entirely--at least not in the next decade (it's hard to make predictions with the advances of technology that we have). It might become more focused on POD (print on demand), and books might shift from mass market to trade, but I think too many readers *and* authors value the print book for that to happen. 2) Most self-published authors I know are interested in making their books available as POD. Not only is it the smart thing to do because there are so many people out there who still prefer print over digital, we also value our print readers just as much as we do our digital readers. Right now it's just a matter of working with the resources we have. But with bookstores shelving less books and forcing readers to purchase traditionally published books online, I think the distinction between self-pubbed print and traditional print will lessen in the next few years.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hi Ashley! I love your books. Thanks for such an interesting post. I really learned a lot. I had never heard of DRM before. I like self-published books as long as the grammar isn't terrible and the stories are good. Congrats on your decision to self-publish. It definitely makes sense if it is easier to get your older and new books out there, you get more money for them, and the buyers pay less. No wonder ebooks are getting so popular. I would love to win A Duke for all Seasons by Mia Marlowe and Love's Portrait by Monica Burns. Thanks for the contest.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Kim, I look forward to read about Mrs Obama and H5O visits. Ashley I think it's wonderful you're going to self publish. I can think of a few times I was so invested in a series only to find out the final book being anticipated wasn't going to happen because the Publisher said sales were down. Now the Authors who self publish can finish their series books.Of course I hope print books are available because I can't read e-books and I see so many great books and they are only in pdf. :(
    Carol L
    Lucky4750 (at) aol (dot) com

    ReplyDelete
  38. This is a very interesting post to read! Definitely agree with most of the points here. One extremely frustrating thing about DRM is that not only does it create a geographical restriction, but also a device restriction. So readers are unable to move their books to a new device (should they change or upgrade to a new one) if the book they bought has DRM.

    ReplyDelete